College cabinets: from zero to twenty-three posts depending on the commune
Number of cabinet posts authorised by the municipal council for the whole college of mayor and aldermen, in full-time equivalents where the survey expresses them that way
| Entity | Value | Date |
|---|---|---|
| anderlecht | 11 | 25 September 2025 |
| auderghem | 0 | 25 September 2025 |
| berchem-sainte-agathe | 2 | 25 September 2025 |
| bruxelles-ville | points system | 25 September 2025 |
| etterbeek | 9.5 | 25 September 2025 |
| evere | 2 | 25 September 2025 |
| forest | 8 | 25 September 2025 |
| ganshoren | 2 | 25 September 2025 |
| ixelles | 23 | 25 September 2025 |
| jette | variable | 25 September 2025 |
| koekelberg | 5 | 25 September 2025 |
| molenbeek-saint-jean | 16 | 25 September 2025 |
| saint-gilles | 8 | 25 September 2025 |
| saint-josse-ten-noode | 13 | 25 September 2025 |
| schaerbeek | 19.5 | 25 September 2025 |
| uccle | 4 | 25 September 2025 |
| watermael-boitsfort | 3 | 25 September 2025 |
| woluwe-saint-lambert | 11 | 25 September 2025 |
| woluwe-saint-pierre | 7 | 25 September 2025 |
Methodology
The survey is produced by the Local Staff Directorate of Brussels Local Authorities from data supplied by the communes, under article 21bis of the New Municipal Act, which requires each municipal council to decide within three months of its installation whether college members may have a cabinet and to set its composition. The data are as at 25 September 2025. For twelve communes the survey states a total or a closed list of posts directly. For five communes it expresses the establishment as a base for the mayor plus an allocation per alderman: the total was then calculated by BGM using the number of serving aldermen, checked on each commune's official website. For the City of Brussels and for Jette no total can be established, see the caveats.
Comparability limitations
These figures describe the establishment authorised by the municipal council, that is a ceiling, not the staff actually in post. They are therefore not comparable with the figure of 93.2 full-time equivalents published for the City of Brussels in August 2026, which measures people actually employed. Two communes escape the count: the City of Brussels uses a points system that caps a grade-weighted cost rather than a number of people, and Jette allows optional pooling between aldermen of the same group whose scale changes the total without the survey documenting the choices made. The totals also add up posts of very different levels: a driver-usher at level D weighs the same as a cabinet director at level A9. Finally, the survey dates from 25 September 2025 and itself notes that decisions may change locally.
Context
Article 21bis of the New Municipal Act leaves each municipal council free to decide whether the members of its college have a cabinet, and to set its composition. That freedom produces nineteen different answers across a territory of 162 square kilometres. Brussels Local Authorities gathered those decisions into a single survey, as at 25 September 2025, which makes comparison possible for the first time.
The data compared
The range runs from zero to twenty-three. Auderghem is the only commune to grant no cabinet to anyone. At the other end, Ixelles authorises twenty-three posts and Schaerbeek 19.5, allocated by political group.
Set against population, the picture shifts. Saint-Josse-ten-Noode authorises one post per roughly 2,100 inhabitants, Ixelles one per 3,900. Conversely, Evere and Uccle sit above 21,000 inhabitants per post, ten times fewer resources relative to population. The two did not make the same choice, however: Uccle reserves its four posts for the mayor alone, Evere places two staff at the disposal of the whole college.
Three models, not nineteen
Behind the spread of figures, the survey reveals three ways of doing things.
No cabinet. Auderghem, alone.
The mayor only. Uccle and Berchem-Sainte-Agathe, and but for one alderwoman Ganshoren. Between two and four people, with aldermen having no staff of their own.
A distributed establishment. The rest, with two rationalising mechanisms visible in the detail. Pooling between aldermen of the same group, in Jette and Woluwe-Saint-Pierre, where staff are allocated per group of three or four aldermen rather than individually. And allocation by electoral list rather than by person, in Anderlecht, Saint-Gilles, Schaerbeek and Watermael-Boitsfort, which moves the arbitration from the college to the parties.
The City of Brussels is the only case of a points system: each grade consumes a number of points, and the cap applies to the weighted total rather than to a headcount. A cabinet can therefore employ more staff by recruiting at a lower level. That mechanism, adopted in early 2025, explains the growth in headcount observed there in August 2026.
One trajectory, only one
Schaerbeek is the only commune in the survey to write an evolution over time into its decision: its establishment goes from 19.5 posts for 2025-2028 to 18.5 for 2028-2030. Everywhere else the establishment is fixed for the term.
What the source does not say
The survey gives a ceiling, not a reality. It says neither how many posts are actually filled nor what they cost. It contains no budget data, global or per commune. That is the main limit of this comparison: it measures what the communes allowed themselves, not what they do.
Last updated: 22 August 2026