Skip to content
Brussels Governance Monitor

Brussels without a government

610

610 days

since the elections of 9 June 2024

The Brussels-Capital Region is operating in 'caretaker mode': the outgoing government handles daily affairs but cannot take any new political decisions or approve a new budget.

Brussels has been without a fully empowered government since June 2024. This site shows what is progressing, what is blocked, and what is known with certainty — based on verifiable public sources.

Brussels has had no real government for over a year. This site shows you what is still working, what has stopped, and why.

Latest event8 February 2026

On 8 February 2026, the MR president announces an unprecedented 7-party negotiation process to form a Brussels government. Configuration: MR, PS, Les Engagés on the French-speaking side; Groen, Vooruit, Anders (ex-Open VLD), CD&V on the Dutch-speaking side. A first meeting is convened for Monday 9 February.

Political initiative
View the full timeline

BGM makes visible what is happening (or not happening) in Brussels without a government.

Every data point is sourced, every metric is verifiable, every analysis is transparent.

Because a democracy needs informed citizens, especially in times of crisis.

Impacted domains

What is blocked, delayed, or degraded due to the absence of government

Last updated: 8 February 2026

Regional budget: the silent erosion

Blocked

Without a new government, the Brussels-Capital Region operates on provisional twelfths. No new budget, no new investments. Inflation erodes the real value of existing expenditure.

Key figures

Provisional twelfths

Budget regime

~1.241billion EUR

Annual budget deficit (2025)

Voted 12/12/2025covers Q1 2026

Provisional twelfths (5th ordinance)

15.65billion EUR (x3 since 2016)

Consolidated gross debt

Official source·Last updated: 8 February 2026
Read the full card

Housing: a structural crisis without a political response

Blocked

62,234 households are waiting for social housing (a historical record), the Housing Fund has suspended all its loans, and the Region cannot launch any new programmes. The gap between supply and demand widens every month.

Key figures

62 234

Households waiting for social housing

42 000units

Social housing stock

412EUR/month

Average social rent

1 321EUR/month

Average private market rent

Official source·Last updated: 8 February 2026
Read the full card

Social affairs: safety nets under strain

Blocked

Brussels CPAS face a surge in applications linked to the unemployment reform, COCOM bicommunal investments are frozen, homelessness policy is at a standstill and new mental health initiatives are blocked. Iriscare operates in minimal mode.

Key figures

In caretaker mode

COCOM funding

~47 000persons

Social Integration Income recipients

Frozen

Homelessness policy

0projects launched

Mental health (new initiatives)

Official source·Last updated: 8 February 2026
Read the full card

Climate: objectives without the means to act

Delayed

Brussels climate targets (-47% CO2 by 2030) remain without new resources. Renolution grants have been reduced, new phases of the Air-Climate-Energy Plan (PACE) are frozen, and no structural investment can be decided in caretaker mode.

Key figures

-47%vs 2005 (Fit for 55)

2030 CO2 reduction target

Diesel Euro 5 bannedsince 01/01/2026 (~225,000 vehicles)

LEZ reinforced

42.2million EUR unpaid

Renolution grants (backlog)

Frozen

Climate Plan (new phases)

BGM estimate·Last updated: 8 February 2026
Read the full card

Employment: a federal reform without a regional response

Delayed

Brussels unemployment is rising (+4.4% in one year) while the federal reform excludes 42,000 Brussels residents from benefits. In caretaker mode, the Region cannot launch new employment programmes or fully respond to the crisis.

Key figures

96 650

Jobseekers (Dec. 2025)

15.4%+4.4% over 1 year

Unemployment rate (admin.)

+3.4%year-on-year change

Youth unemployment

42 000cumulative estimate

Excluded from benefits (Jan. 2026 – Jul. 2027)

Official source·Last updated: 8 February 2026
Read the full card

Mobility: major projects on hold

Delayed

Metro 3 (North-South line to Bordet), tunnel renovation, and new phases of Good Move are awaiting political decisions. STIB continues its day-to-day operations.

Key figures

Suspended

Metro 3 (new phases)

161million EUR frozen (permits obtained)

Loi-Belliard Tunnel

+255%vs initial budget, horizon 2034+

Metro 3 (budget overrun)

Frozen

Good Move (new phases)

Official source·Last updated: 8 February 2026
Read the full card

How can this be resolved?

Realistic, documented, and sourced exit paths

Delayed classical coalition

High feasibility

Mechanism

The Brussels political parties eventually reach a coalition agreement on a comprehensive government programme. A formateur appointed by Parliament negotiates the ministerial portfolios and policy content.

Timeline

A few months

Who can trigger this

The Brussels political parties represented in Parliament

Precedent

Federal Belgium: after 541 days without a government, formation of the Di Rupo government (2010-2011). Then 494 days before the De Croo government (2019-2020). (Belgium, 2011)

Risks

  • Prolonged negotiations with no guarantee of a result
  • A watered-down compromise that fails to address the accumulated emergencies
  • Voter fatigue in the face of a scenario already seen at the federal level
Read the full card

Constructive motion of no confidence

Very low feasibility

Mechanism

Parliament tables a constructive motion of no confidence against the caretaker government, accompanied by a candidate for minister-president and a programme

Timeline

Immediate

Who can trigger this

An absolute majority of parliamentarians in each of the two linguistic groups of the Brussels Parliament

Risks

  • A majority is required simultaneously in BOTH linguistic groups — extremely difficult to assemble
  • Never used at the level of the Brussels-Capital Region
  • The caretaker government is not technically 'in office' in the full sense, creating a legal ambiguity
  • Risk of institutional crisis if the motion's admissibility is challenged
Read the full card

Emergency government with a limited mandate

Medium feasibility

Mechanism

The parties agree on a short government programme limited to emergencies: passing the budget, absorbing European funds, and unblocking critical pending matters. No comprehensive coalition agreement.

Timeline

A few weeks

Who can trigger this

The Brussels political parties, under pressure from social and economic stakeholders

Risks

  • No formal precedent in Belgium — possible political resistance
  • Risk that the 'temporary' becomes permanent without resolving underlying disagreements
  • Questionable legitimacy if the mandate is too limited for effective action
  • Opposition parties may refuse to participate
Read the full card

Minority government

Low feasibility

Mechanism

A government formed without an absolute majority, operating on a case-by-case basis with shifting majorities depending on the issue

Timeline

A few weeks

Who can trigger this

Parties willing to govern without a guaranteed majority, with the tacit agreement of the opposition not to table a motion of no confidence

Precedent

Denmark, Sweden, Norway (common in Scandinavia), Canada. Never done in Belgium. (Denmark, 2022)

Risks

  • Permanent instability — the government can be toppled at any time
  • Total dependence on the goodwill of the opposition for each vote
  • Every issue becomes a separate negotiation, considerably slowing public action
  • Increased complexity in Brussels due to the dual linguistic majority
Read the full card

Early regional elections

Near impossible

Mechanism

The federal Chamber of Representatives votes by a two-thirds majority to dissolve the Brussels Parliament and organise new regional elections. The King then sets the date of the ballot.

Timeline

Several years

Who can trigger this

The Chamber of Representatives (federal Parliament) — two-thirds majority required

Risks

  • The Brussels Parliament cannot dissolve itself — it has a fixed 5-year term
  • Requires a two-thirds majority in the federal Chamber — a nearly impossible threshold to reach
  • New elections would probably produce similar results without resolving the deadlock
  • No precedent in Belgian history for the dissolution of a regional parliament
  • Federal interference in regional affairs — perceived as an infringement on autonomy
Read the full card

Technocratic government

Near impossible

Mechanism

A government composed of non-partisan experts, appointed to manage the Region's affairs outside the logic of classical coalition politics

Timeline

A few weeks

Who can trigger this

Consensus among parties represented in the Brussels Parliament to temporarily relinquish executive power

Precedent

Italy (Monti 2011, Draghi 2021), never in Belgium (Italy, 2021)

Risks

  • No direct democratic legitimacy — ministers do not carry a partisan electoral mandate
  • Foreseeable resistance from political parties, who would lose control of the executive
  • No Belgian precedent at any level of government
  • Brussels ministers must be parliamentarians — an external expert cannot be appointed directly
  • Limited lifespan without a lasting political anchor
Read the full card

Timeline

Follow the steps of the Brussels government formation

View the full timeline

Stay informed

Receive a weekly digest of updates on the domains that interest you.

Topics to follow

Max. 1 email/week. Unsubscribe in 1 click.